You think I’m kidding, dont you? Click on the kitty pervert and Meridian will blow your mind.
Is it any surprise
That the folks can’t decide
if they oppose or promote
Global Warming, my lord!
All the facts they ignore
When John Pratt gets his pen
I’m ready to scream
I haven’t read your e-rag
I let you back in my heart
and you give me a start
for the anti-family communist drivel spread by radical environmentalists coming to take your home
Confused? Here you go
Seriously folks. It’s 2009. Can you please figure out a way to get an RSS feed up and running? Please?
Possibly a thoughtful consideration of the upcoming election….
Let’s look at some headers
-Are you Anti-Cloning?
-Do you hate teh geh?
-Do you hate teh Transsexual so much you use scare quotes when you refer to them?
Promoting Stronger Marriages
Do you support a U.S. constitutional amendment to define and protect marriage as the union of one man and one woman?
If you do not support a U.S. constitutional amendment to define and protect marriage now, would any of these hypothetical future circumstances allow you to support such amendment?
*if one or several state supreme courts require their states to recognize same-sex marriages from another state.
*if the U.S. Supreme Court requires states to recognize same-sex marriages from another state (thus overturning a provision of the federal Defense of Marriage Act)
*if the U.S. Supreme Court requires the federal government to recognize same-sex marriages and/or partnerships for any purpose under federal law (thus overturning a provision of the federal Defense of Marriage Act)
*if the U.S. Supreme Court rules that same-sex marriage is a right under the U.S. Constitution
The Federal Defense of Marriage Act (1996) declares marriage to be the union of one man and one woman for all purposes of the federal government and declares that states do not have to recognize same-sex marriages from other states. Which of the follow describes your position on the federal DOMA?
*I would veto any bill that would weaken any provision of the federal DOMA
*I would support repeal of the provision of DOMA that defines marriage as the union of one man and one woman for all federal purposes, thus freeing the federal government to give marital benefits to same-sex couples.
*I would support repeal of the provision of DOMA that declares states do not have to recognize same-sex marriages from other states, thus leaving courts free to require such recognition under the Constitution’s “full faith and credit” clause.
There is not a single item in here about actually promoting stronger marriages. This is entirely focused on removing the civil rights of American citizens.
Ur ugli and ur mamma dresses u funni! SRSLY!
To be sure, religion has also played a big part in Sen. Obama’s campaign. But that’s different. He had to do something about the perception of the Democrats as the anti-religious party. Anyway, he’s black, and it’s understood that blacks are given a pass when, among other things, it comes to religion and politics. Even the rantings of someone like the Rev. Jeremiah Wright must be “contextualized” within the narrative of victimhood. As the senator said before he disowned the Rev. Wright, he could no more disown the Rev. Wright than he could disown the black community
‘Anyway, he’s black, and it’s understood that blacks are given a pass’. WTF?